Two Scientific Theories About Food Addiction - Are They Both Right
By Jonni Good
Several different theories about food addiction are being
considered by the scientific community. Most of us have heard of the
“thrifty gene” theory. This theory suggests that people who have
this gene will eat more calories today as an instinctive response to
the possibility of famine tomorrow.
Another theory suggests that overeating fats and simple sugars is a
“rational addiction,” because the cost of withdrawal is higher than
the cost of maintaining the habit of overeating. The costs could
include the physical symptoms of withdrawal from addictive foods,
the costs of weight loss treatment, and the possible higher cost of
buying more nutritious meals.
The decisions made by government agencies and individual counselors
depend on which of these theories they accept.
If the rational addiction theory is held to be true, laws might be
passed to reduce the cost of highly nutritious vegetables and
proteins, which are low in calories, and increase the cost of
low-quality foods such as sugar and high-fat snacks, perhaps with
new taxes. The financial costs of weight loss programs and
medications could be lowered with subsidies. Health agencies might
create educational and counseling programs to help obese clients
make better, less irrational choices when they shop.
On the other hand, if there really is a “thrifty gene” that causes
food addiction, scientists would look for ways to “turn off the
gene” through new medications or gene therapy. Counseling would
consist of helping people recognize their natural tendencies, and
help them create an environment in which more rational eating
choices would be easier to make. Perhaps governments would regulate
the creation and sale of high-fat, sugary foods as if they were an
environmental hazard.
To determine which of these theories can be used to explain the very
high incidence of obesity and type-2 diabetes among the Pima Indians
in the American Southwest, two professors from Arizona State
University looked at the shopping activity at several Arizona
supermarkets. The study compared the shopping choices at stores near
the Pima community, which has an astounding diabetes rate of almost
50%, with those made by the general population at supermarkets in
other locations.
The professors determined that the low prices of foods high in
simple sugars has led to the over-consumption of these harmful foods
in all populations, but that non-native people as a group consume
these cheaper foods in lower quantities than do the members of the
Pima tribe as a whole. The study did not look at the shopping
behavior of individuals.
This may mean that both the “thrifty gene” theory and the economic
“rational addiction” theory are correct, and not mutually exclusive.
It is true that foods made from white flour and sugar tend to be
less expensive (per calorie) than higher quality foods containing
protein and whole grains. The easy availability of poor-quality
foods, along with high-fat fast food, has had a striking consequence
for all Western nations.
Some people do choose to avoid these fattening foods and eat healthy
veggies and low-fat meats instead, which lends weight to the thrifty
gene theory. However, income does play a part. According to the U.S.
Department of Health and Human services, “women of lower
socioeconomic status are approximately 50% more likely to be obese
than those of higher socioeconomic status.” This statistic includes
all racial and ethnic groups.
The incidence of type-2 diabetes, hypertension and heart disease is
going up for all Western populations and the long-term effects of
this illness are devastating both to the individual and society. In
the general population, approximately one-third of American adults
are overweight, and a third of these are obese. The occurrence of
obesity in the general population has almost doubled since 1960, and
is quickly catching up to the high rates of obesity and diabetes
among the well-studied Pimas.
Because it is estimated that obesity is related to a 10 to 50%
increased risk of death from all causes, and the cost of chronic
diseases associated with obesity are creating a drain on the
national treasury, it is particularly important to find a workable
theory about food addiction. Perhaps if we gain a better
understanding of why people overeat, in spite of obvious
consequences, scientists will be able to find a cure for the
international problem of obesity.
To read more about
food
addiction, and learn about a program that helps
you overcome your cravings for sugar and fat, visit
http://www.howtothinkthin.com
|